D. Robert Hamm's picture

Thanks. We have something in

Thanks. We have something in common--I've been known to read sociology and anthropology textbooks for fun in my spare time. And yeah--I'd say the film could be called something of a mini-ethnography.

I do, as I implied above, think the film is also designed to keep certain people out, but the people it would keep out are those too hidebound and intolerant to accept the Dutch "live and let live" way of life. It just so happens that the most visible groups of those at the moment are radical extremist Muslims and evangelical fundamentalist Christians (which is why I think the film should be required viewing for potential American immigrants, as well). These are people who have no interest in becoming a part of Dutch society, and I think it is pretty reasonable to keep them out.

The accusations of religious intolerance, though, are ludicrous. These Muslim and Christian extremists want the "freedom," to force their religions on others. When they are forced to tolerate the lifestyles of others, they scream about persecution. It's sort of like the Ku Klux Klan claiming that they're being discriminated against because they're not allowed to persecute black people.

Dude, it's good to hear (read) what you have to say. Hope to see you back here for more insightful commentary.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <i>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Each email address will be obfuscated in a human readble fashion or (if JavaScript is enabled) replaced with a spamproof clickable link.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.